On the role of Soros
In short, Soros has had (i) moments in which he has played a positive role, (ii) moments for which there is not enough evidence, or happened elsewhere and (iii) some ugly moments and hypocrisy with the principles he expresses in words. On the positive side, we can mention the study grants program, through which hundreds of students and researchers were somehow helped to study or take part in some qualification in the west in the first years after the fall of communism. Positive has been the support in important, but marginalized areas such as the issues of children, the environment, Roma, as well as the Education project (AEDP).The initiative to double Cambodia WhatsApp Number Data or triple the salaries of the directors that Edi Rama received in the Municipality of Tirana can also be called positive, although he did this only for the directors of Rama and not, for example, for those of the municipalities of Shkodër or Korçë. Even the capture of the entire government of Rama in 2013 by bringing eminences from abroad (like the Yugoslavs to Enver in 1945), although unacceptable for sovereign countries, we may not prejudice it as it may even be considered a desire to help a country that is led by a without school. There are some moments that are extremely accused at the international level, such as, for example, the issue of supporting immigration from Asia to destabilize EU countries, but on this topic there is no irrefutable evidence.
https://manchestermassage.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Cambodia-WhatsApp-Number-Data.png
He has been publicly accused by the UK government of financial speculation that damaged the economy and the jobs of thousands of people and as a result has been declared non grata in Great Britain for more than 10 years, as well as being publicly accused by the Prime Minister of Malaysia for financial speculation that could endanger the finances, but also the livelihood of thousands of citizens in Malaysia. The capture of European institutions (Parliament or the European Court) through persons trusted and supported with payments is an ugly show and undermines the independence of the institutions. Anyway, these moments remain outside of Albania, although we have seen that they constantly influence Albania as well through emissaries who wear official hats, but played a role for private interests.
頁:
[1]